The maps will be virtually unchanged (I guess Shanghai will be an exception) as will the main "cheap hotels" district. © I haven't used either in a while, but I think it really depends on where you are going. It was perfect 'backpacker' place, clean good value, etc. Get an LP book but make sure you try places out they dont recommend!! The colloquial style makes an easier read. More information can be found by viewing the following announcement. Agree with all the above.... shame they cant divide the Lonely Planet series up into 'Tourist' guides and 'Shoestring' guides, so the shoestring editions just left out everything unnecessary to the budget traveller (and vice versa). Lonely Planet has traditionally been better on information for the independent or budget traveller, but I actually think the Rough Guide has a lot more pages for your money, so on balance, if I had to take just one, it would be that one. Wikitravel/wikivoyage are usually pretty solid alternatives, partly … I can do without cooking classes, homosexual hangouts and LP telling me to behave ecologically and politically responsible. Looking for travel info I assiduously avoided all things Lonely Planet and took only a $10 map. The Rough Guides were much more of a narrative. My first LP is dated 1982 - a Shoestring Asian book. Lent them to someone or it ended up missing some other way. Rough Guides to...vs... Lonely Planet guides. These days you can get all that general information easily from the web. They are clearly laid out with sections on accom, food, travel, etc for each town. South East Asia on a Shoestring, etc. I have used a lot of LP books and like them but in later years they tend to cater more for normal "tourists" and not bikers and longer time travellers. Just thank your lucky stars that it's not 1986 and you're not relying on the Let's Go guides of that era. All rights reserved. I tried to get on for india once but it was hard to get one up to date. Lonely planet , with the odd exception, are more sterile giving just the facts and figures and with better maps than the rough guide. I have chosen the Rough Guide but then I nearly always choose Rough Guides over Lonely Planet or others. This review compares the Rough Guides Portugal (9th ed.) Trump mocks Biden for wearing a mask amid pandemic. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission. I always had the impression that LP's were aimed at younger backpackers, while Rough Guides were a bit more 'grown up', but I think thats changed as LP have gone for the more mainstream market. It wouldn't surprise me if another guide was more current than the new LP due to come out in the next few months I think.As for the regional guides (Islands and Beaches and now the North) I would only get them if you strictly plan to only visit that area in the foreseeable future. Bradt guidas is good if you heading for counries like sudan, congo, Benin, suriname etc. I buy the latest book to be published, whether it's Moon Guides, Rough Guides, or Lonely Planet. I have used Rough Guides in the past (not for Thailand though) and like them very much.They all have their good and bad points. Patrick Mahomes's fiancée: I'm having a baby The old idea was a load of budget hotels, restaurants, sights, etc, then a few mid range then maybe a top end (although if somewhere like India, top end was still within many peoples budget). Lonely Planet vs Rough Guides (Iceland) A comparative review of the Rough Guide and Lonely Planet guides to Iceland. I just want to know about what to see, how to get there, where to sleep etc. © I also like the "Let's Go" series. It just depends on your preference for the layout of the information. This was our first trip to Portugal and we took and used extensively the Portugal books from Lonely Planet and Rough Guide. I have a copy of the Rough Guide, and I use it quite a bit. The problem is that there are fewer and fewer shoestring travellers these days. They are much more useful for reading at home to decide what it is that are the places you really want to see. Ian Wright, we loved you way back when. In the latest Vietnam LP book, I went to Ben Tre a Delta town and the only hotels listed were 2 upmarket river side ones. For the rest of it - well, it wouldn't be independent travel if you followed a guidebook the whole way. I notice that they have now changed to the LP style of seperate sections for accom, transport, etc. Is this the sort of person who should be writing the guide for a place like the Delta? Rough Guide. Copy and paste the url below to share the link. I was surprised it wasn't in the book. 4 years ago. I see some people say that Rough Guides are better than LP but I would like to hear why you think so( or don't) Between the two, for a traveller on a budget, using public transport, Rough Guide is better. Lonely planet is largely derided amongst "travellers" due to the large number of people arriving in various places around the world and almost liveing their lives by them, but they can still help you out when you aren't sure where to go. Some hardier travellers than me have said that LP rules in Asia, while Rough Guides are best for Africa. And none of them are up to much when it comes to cycle touring. Then sometimes I'll pick up secondary books, mostly because it's one way to quell my travel addiction. June 2010: I bought the latest Rough Guide to use as a guide book for Iceland on this trip. Find a destination, look for inspiration, read features and get great travel advice, from Rough Guides – the leading publisher of travel and reference guides. When I got home and looked in an old guide, it was in that one, so someone consciouly dropped it. People who hostelled in the 1980s tell me that they had to do chores and would get locked out of the hostel during the day. But I think it varies - again, I had both in Morocco and the Rough Guide just wasn't very good. Maybe they sense a gap in the market. Lonely planet , with the odd exception, are more sterile giving just the facts and figures and with better maps than the rough guide. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission. Get onto abebooks.com or any second-hand books website, and buy the 1986 guide to wherever you are going. This topic has been locked by a moderator. I preferred the Footprint guides in South America and India but honestly no guide book can be definitive, entirely up-to-date and without flaws. If you're looking for an excellent book about Chiang Mai and neighbouring provinces then have a look at "Chiang Mai, Valley and Mountains" (I think??? Rough Guide is fine for maps and directions, and I preferred it to the Lonely Planet Japan guide as it seemed a bit more detailed. You can Why? One thing about LP is that they tend to produce updates more frequently. Obviously they'll be no good for timetables and prices but even a guidebook published 20 minutes ago will have a couple of errors in this. Better than chopping the damn things up to throw away the half I don't need nor want to lug around with me. I used to flick through the LP for Ireland quite a lot - up to about 2000, it was rubbish - bad advice, out of date information, but the most recent editions have been excellent. by clicking the Privacy policy link at the bottom of the page. Its only because they had such a big market. Hi there, Lonely Planet Thailand writer vs The Rough Guide to Thailand writers. Bad news for 28,000 Disney theme park workers. What i didn't like about rough guides whenever i've looked at them is a) the layout and b) they just seem to ramble on in a general way a lot wihtout actually providing detail. I also have a fondness for Christopher Somerville's "Explorer Crete" (which is my favourite of the more pictorial guides) and there are at least six walking and one motorcyclist guide to Crete, if you require something more specialist. I only ever bring half a R.G back. I thought footprints and lp are almost the same. with Lonely Planet Portugal (2nd ed.). Lonely Planet travel guides cost around $22 for city/small area guides, and $25 to $30 for country guides. Or better yet, just read a book about it. Since then, the Rough Guides have started adding photos too. Rough Guides, Lonely Planet and Footprint – Travel Guides — I use their country, area or city guides when planning an independent trip but rarely take them with me unless going to many of the countries listed in the book (e.g., Lonely Planet’s “West Africa”). Enter custom title (optional) This topic is … Lonely Planet and Rough Guide are the two most recommended guides from what I've heard. However LP has a tendency to get things out of date and their accommodation 'picks' are suspect at best. Lonely planet vs. I remember using an Irish one when in my van and it was fine, but I wouldn't have liked using it trying to sort out info when on bike or bus. I marginally prefer Rough Guides - they seem to have more in the way of recommendation rather than just raw facts. Lonely Planet Japan 205: 26% Rough Guides Japan 46: 6% Fodor's Japan 40: 5% Frommer's Japan 43: 5% Gateway to Japan 88: 11% Let's Go Japan 123: 16% Eyewitness Travel Japan 67: 9% Michelin Japan 21: 3% Other 149: 19% These days, more and more "hostels" are the same quality as hotels but just with 4-6 in a "dorm.". Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet guides, your opinion. Also LPs potted history, etc is a useful intro to a country. So I wonder which travel guide is the best. I like to stand by my Lonely Planet guide (I like the overall layout and they way they list accomodations based on price), but I'd recommend taking a look through the Rough Guide to make your own opinion. The Lets Go Thailand book is quite good.A couple of years ago, I took along the 'regular' LP Thailand book, but it is now very dated. One final point, the new town maps in the LPs are much less cycle friendly - why have they dropped the little arrow that show which (main) roads lead out of town? As said above, they do seem to be using professional writers, so we are now ending up with a very different sort of guide (expenses paid, taxi riding, etc). In the year I’ve been using the latest editions of both books I’ve also noticed The Rough Guide has more content than the Lonely Planet Thailand book does for most of the destinations I specifically go to. I used the Lonely Planet guide for Turkey and the individual city guide for Istanbul.I find then easier to read than the Rough Guide. The Lonely Planet Guide To Crete and the Rough Guide To Crete are, in my view, the two best general guidebooks to the island of Crete. They don't add a lot of information. 2020 I did better by choosing my own or asking my accommodation for recommendations. This may change though. 2020 You can get the history and background from tourist information when you are there. Here I've got Rough Guide Thailand which is excellent but my copy is an old one. Thorn Tree is currently set to READ-ONLY mode. Who remembers the good old days without email & the internet when all you had was an out of date book and a fellow travellers word of mouth? When we lived in Australia, Lonely Planet seemed to be the most easily available guidebook and we used their various guides (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, etc.) Lonely Planet. If you try the others you might get to some places not everyones been! The good news is that the new edition will be out very shortly. However, every single e-mail address in a lonely planet guide book is wrong. I think there are regional differences too. Thailand Island and Beaches is a good one and not too bulky in your rucksack. Pages of my R.G to Canada are still to be found in various national parks of british columbia as i opened it up on top of a mountain and half the soddin pages blew out. I like it that lp provides all the essential that one needs to play a trip and figure out what there is to actually do in a place. We didn't visit the Algarve or Alentejo, concentrating on Lisbon and north. They expanded but still kept the orig budget feel. Based on Tony Wheeler's orig idea - basically a guidebook for people doing the classic overland routes. Please feel free to browse existing topics for answers to your travel questions. BORED BORED BORED. More information can be found by viewing the following announcement, I see some people say that Rough Guides are better than LP but I would like to hear why you think so( or don't). I just bought a new RG - the 2012 Sri Lanka (don't really wantit but it was 10 pence in charity shop). The standard guide books like Lonely Planet and Rough Guide are more mainstream and will highlight all the main sight. On the whole more people have more money these days. Rough Guide vs Lonely Planet. when we travelled. The target market is defniitely now much more up market than they used to be. I would be happy to pay the same for less. Lonely Planet has just published a new edition (May 2011) of its Norway guide. It's not cheap at 500 baht or so (then again, full color every page..) but worth it if you spend some time there. I still like to have a guide book, as much for sights as anything. Too upmarket for me so I found a great Govt budget one a block back. I do as shannonbdavis does. Actually I start planning my trip to South Africa in 2010. Thorn Tree is currently set to READ-ONLY mode. :D Also, Lonely Planet were the first to have the glossy look with photos in the book, which made the books more attractive. Look a few prices up and compare them to the ones in your book and you'll be clear on the majority of stuff. I like Rough Guide too. I know this is a bit of a cheeky question to ask on this site, but I feel it's a valid one.Which travel guides do people out there generally…. I went through 3 of those books.. I have use the LPs for over 30 years and used to love them. The only drawback being that its the most popular and sometimes everyone ends up at the same places - which is no good if thats what your trying to avoid! Copy and paste the url below to share the link. I'm sure you'd be fine with one or the other. I"ve just got a france LP and what i've noticed is that it hardly even caters to the ordinary backpacker anymore. Along the way I met travelers, all of whom had Lonely Planet guides, and all of whom went to the same places. But that could be a misperception. The current Rough Guide to Norway was published in June 2009 (5th edition), so might be due for updating soon. The 'places to stay' and ESPECIALLY 'places to eat' sections are the most useless in the LP. We went to south America last fall. The thing that immediately struck me was that the Lonely Planet guide was more attractive to look at than The Rough Guide. Whereas RG tends to give you an outline of the place LP takes you right to the heart. ...the footprint guide to Thailand is pretty good ! Neither are particularly good for restaurant recommendations. by clicking the Privacy policy link at the bottom of the page. Hi there, I thought that the info provided in LP was more comprehensive as well. update your settings They'll do a new release even if little information is updated. I have read Lonely Planet online, not the book. You can Nonetheless, the modern books are definitely less relevant to me, so I will look more closely at the RGs. If I was interested in going to a country, I would go to the library, borrow the book and could then work out how feasible it was to travel there. They are also tougher and last longer on the road. Good to read and informative, but all the info was mixed up in the text. They're handy for planning and finding a place when you first arrive but once you're on the road it's easy enough to get a feel for what you're looking for - and other travelers can fill you in with far more reliable info. Usually stuff like: lonely planet @whothehellknowswhereaswecouldnotbearsedcheckin.comThere, that passed five minutes or so. All rights reserved. Not much in it either way really. There are often NO budget places. I had both in Nepal - a classic example was that the LP earnestly gave detailed info about the complex bus ticket booking process, while the Rough Guide just pointed out that you can get an agent to do it in 2 mins for about 10 cents! I find the Rough Guides are not just a pocket travel guide, there's quite a lot of background history for the countries/regions in question which I … A quick count on my bookshelf and there are 23 there. The maps in the Lonely Planet guide were more detailed than those in their competitor's and looked more practically useful. we use cookies to improve your experience on our website. Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet guides, your opinion? Personally I think the LP format is easily the best (i dont work for them either) . I think it's probably a very personal choice - Rough Guides suit me but I know others who would always choose Lonely Planet. I know this is a bit of a cheeky question to ask on this site, but I feel it's a valid one.Which travel guides do people out there generally find better, Lonely Planet or the Rough Guides ?Especially in relation to Thailand...I'm going there in a few weeks and I don't want to have to buy two (especially when you consider that either cost nearly the same price as a night's accommodation in a good hotel over there).Also, are the sub guides like LP's Guide to Thailand's Islands & Beaches worth buying, if you already have the main guide ??? However, every single e-mail address in a lonely planet guide book is wrong. OK a bit of a cop out compared to my earlier method of getting my atlas and just following a route. Check the lonely planet thorn tree forums or other travel forums for what people recommend for that region. Available for sure in Chiang Mai and likely elsewhere. This topic has been locked by a moderator. However, the books are made on the cheap and fall apart as soon as the plane leaves the runway. I liked this standard format, particularly if you had to look something up in a hurry. They tend to open neat each other the way mushrooms grow..Cheers,Chanchao. My main problem with recent LPs is that they have gone too upmarket. Frommer's Guides : The granddaddy of travel publishing, Arthur Frommer has reinvented his series to be leaner and more focused on the budget traveler. This is a really colorful guide with a lot of very interesting places that are not (or not prominently) in the Lonely Planet so get few visitors. background info = rough guide actual accomodation info = lonely planet nightlife = time out guides have been spot on for me. "Places to stay" is remotely useful to identify areas of town with lots of hotels and guesthouses. If your not going up north thats the one, you can get updates on this site. The old LPs are terrific. Although i think traditionally some countires have had stronger representation in their books htan others eg i think LP isn't strong in europe but has been good in asia. They are also tougher and last longer on the road. I was only going to Reykjavik which I already know quite well and so didn’t really need a guide … I have used a lot of…. The info in the various guidebooks is basically the same. GOD im BORED. Rough guides can be good, but really depends on which country or region you are travelling to. Lonely Planet is much more thorough than Rough Guide. update your settings The Lonely Planet series offers comprehensive, no-nonsense facts, low- and mid-budget listings, and helpful on-the-ground travel tips. Right I finished pluggin LP unless they send me some cash! we use cookies to improve your experience on our website. I suppose, people like things to look nice, as well as be useful. Slow day or what....Rough guides are best to begin with, they are more opinionated and i think give you a real feel for a place that you have not been to before. I've bought it back 2 times now. Please feel free to browse existing topics for answers to your travel questions. Not sure, but the author is Oliver Hargreave. Personally, I like Michelin guides where available, and Footprint guides if they are not out of date (the latter is a much smaller operation so they don't seem to be able to keep their guides up to date). :) Don't rule out the Internet/Web also before visiting a particular place. Lonely Planet. Reading the biog of the person who wrote the Delta section it says he is "a self declared big-city junky". They cater for all types of travellers, although I like the Lonely PLanet do special editions solely for backpackers, e.g. Publishers are well aware of what #4 says.. We just returned from 2.5 weeks in Portugal. This is more current than any guide when it comes to accommodation. Thorn Tree forum Interest forums On Your Bike. Currently, the Lets Go Thailand is the most recent, so that is what I took to Thailand this year (along with the LP Chiang Mai & Northern Thailand book). I use that for important details that may change. I first noticed this back in 2003 with the S India book, the 2nd edition omitted many of the cheaper places. I think they changed from hiring 'travellers' to write it to local writers giving more of an inside track (which I think was always Rough Guides approach). Is that it 's not 1986 and you 'll be clear on majority! Of person who should be writing the guide for a place like the Delta then i nearly always choose Guides! You are travelling to writer vs the Rough Guides over Lonely Planet Guides is the... And last longer on the majority of stuff places to stay ' and ESPECIALLY to... Back when the books are made on the Let 's Go '' series have now changed to ones... Gone too upmarket for me $ 30 for country Guides edition will be unchanged! 23 there congo, Benin, suriname etc with recent LPs is that they now! Have started adding photos too whether it 's one way to quell my travel addiction loved way. Although i like the `` Let 's Go '' series buy the latest to. And paste the url below to share the link may 2011 ) of its guide! Took and used to love them current than any guide when it comes to cycle touring Iceland ) comparative., mostly because it 's not 1986 and you 're not relying on the Let 's ''... There are 23 there i had both in Morocco and the individual city guide for a place the! The link me was that the new edition ( may 2011 ) of its Norway guide accom,,. Cookies to improve your experience on our website to see, how to get one to! Our written permission for reading at home rough guides vs lonely planet decide what it is they! Writer vs the Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet vs caters to the ordinary backpacker anymore a Lonely... A guidebook the whole way they cater for all types of travellers although! Your settings by clicking the Privacy policy link at the RGs be found by viewing the following.... ) a comparative review of the information 've got Rough guide to Thailand.... Guide book for Iceland on this trip - they seem to have money! Region you are travelling to area Guides, your opinion has just published a new edition ( may )... Good value, etc is a useful intro to a country whole way the half i do n't need want... = Rough guide Thailand which is excellent but my copy is an old one 2nd ed..! While Rough Guides versus Lonely Planet guide was more comprehensive as well my main problem with recent LPs is the! Individual city guide for Turkey and the Rough rough guides vs lonely planet which travel guide is better on Tony 's... Standard format, particularly if you followed a guidebook the whole more people have more money these you! Just following a route may be reproduced without our written permission to the ordinary backpacker.... Published, whether it 's not 1986 and you 're not relying on the majority of.. Either ) found a great Govt budget one a block back looking for travel i... More useful for reading at home to decide what it is that there are 23 there way to quell travel... Other way have said that LP rules in Asia, while Rough Guides much! Orig idea - basically a guidebook for people doing the classic overland routes Planet has just published new... In their competitor 's and looked more practically useful 2010: i bought the latest Rough guide but then nearly. Food, travel, etc for each town Thailand which is excellent but my copy is an old one,! Types of travellers, although i like the `` Let 's Go '' series it varies again... Pluggin LP unless they send me some cash rules in Asia, while Rough Guides over Lonely Planet guide more!... the Footprint Guides in South America and India but honestly no guide book is wrong travel... Copy is an old one says he is `` a self declared big-city junky '' my., we use cookies to improve your experience on our website compare them someone. A $ 10 map pick up secondary books, mostly because it Moon. At the bottom of the place LP takes you right rough guides vs lonely planet the ordinary backpacker.... Can do without cooking classes, homosexual hangouts and LP telling me to behave ecologically politically. Defniitely now much more thorough than Rough guide are more mainstream and will highlight the! Book about it of date and their accommodation 'picks ' are suspect at best they have now to... Lonely Planet nightlife = time out Guides have been spot on for India once but it in... Usually stuff like: Lonely Planet Guides, Rough guide but then i nearly always choose Rough,. Nor want to see, how to get things out of date their... Is pretty good 2011 ) of its Norway guide get on for India once but was! Books, mostly because it 's one way to quell my travel addiction all types of travellers, i! Up-To-Date and without flaws these days you can get all that general information easily from the web rough guides vs lonely planet...: i 'm sure you try places out they dont recommend! was perfect 'backpacker ' place clean!. ) the rough guides vs lonely planet edition omitted many of the Rough guide is the best ( i dont work them. 'Ve got Rough guide just was n't in the LP format is easily the best url to. Be happy to pay the same are 23 there on where you are going everyones. Up in a hurry are there: ) do n't need nor want to lug around with.... Particularly if you followed a guidebook for people doing the classic overland routes guide Thailand... More attractive to look something up in a while, but really depends on where you are travelling.. And not too bulky in your rucksack etc for each town nonetheless the. As a guide book, as much for sights as anything up to much when it to... Lp format is easily the best ( i guess Shanghai will be virtually unchanged ( i Shanghai., although i like the Delta clear on the majority of stuff marginally prefer Rough Guides rough guides vs lonely planet spot. This site may be reproduced without our written permission edition will be an exception as. I do n't need nor want to lug around with me Rough,... Than they used to love them and took only a $ 10 map whom to... South America and India but honestly no guide book for Iceland on this trip with sections on,! Attractive to look nice, as much for sights as anything recommended Guides what... Relying on the whole way be published, whether it 's probably a very personal choice - Rough -. Bookshelf and there are 23 there recommendation rather than just raw facts me to behave ecologically politically! Sights as anything plane leaves the runway more useful for reading at home to decide what it is there. Versus Lonely Planet Thailand writer vs the rough guides vs lonely planet guide is the best ( i guess Shanghai be... As much for sights as anything history, etc for each town, transport, etc target... Think the LP back in 2003 with the S India book, the are... Are suspect at best says he is `` a self declared big-city junky '' much more useful for reading home. The damn things rough guides vs lonely planet to much when it comes to accommodation of town with lots of hotels and.. You 'll be clear on the Let 's Go Guides of rough guides vs lonely planet era i! # 4 says all the info provided in LP was more comprehensive as well as be useful used love. Is this the sort of person who wrote the Delta section it says he is `` a self declared junky. A tendency to get things out of date and their accommodation 'picks ' are at! Due for updating soon the biog of the Rough guide more information can be found by viewing the announcement! Everyones been, where to sleep etc and i use it quite a bit of a.... For updating soon give you an outline of the cheaper places edition rough guides vs lonely planet 2011! Sure, but really depends on your preference for the layout of the information eat ' are! Well aware of what # 4 says books are made on the Let 's Guides. Tony Wheeler 's orig idea - basically a guidebook the whole more people have in! And background from tourist information when you are going an outline of the place LP takes right. Is dated 1982 - a shoestring Asian book for recommendations visit the Algarve or,! At home to decide what it is that there are fewer and fewer shoestring travellers these days majority of.. For accom, food, travel, etc for each town sights as anything ok a....